Education for Democratic Citizenship in Korea and the Development of the Concept of Civics: a focus on the middle school textbooks during the United States military administration and in the 1950s (2023.03)

Dynamics of Candlelight Protestors: In Respect of Political Opportunity Structures (2023.02)

  • Author : Hyun-Jin Cha
  • Publication :  Journal of Korean Politics
  • Publisher :  The Institute for Political Studies
  • Volume : 32(1)
  • Date : February 2023

Abstract: This paper aims to identify the changes of candlelight protest participants since 2004. While existing literature on candlelight protests tends to analyze the causes of candlelight protests at macro-level or the characteristics of candlelight protestors at micro-level, this paper analyzes the differences between a candlelight protest participant and a nonparticipant at micro-level while simultaneously considering the political opportunity structure. This research asserts that the police responses to protests and the Democratic advantage in Congress are the political opportunity structures that affect people to participate in the candlelight protests. The police responses to protests affect the cost to participate in the candlelight protest while the Democratic advantage in Congress impacts on the benefit from protesting. The impact of the political opportunity structure on the protest participation vary depending on the voter type. The empirical analysis shows the likelihood of core liberal voters and swing voters protesting decreased as police arrested protestors or suppressed protests. Also, the hypothesis was confirmed in that the increase of Democratic Advantage in Congress affected the likelihood of core liberal voters to protest more than it would affect the likelihood of swing voters to protest. As this paper evaluates a series of multiple candlelight protests and proposes a multilevel framework, the paper overcomes the limits of existing literature that studied candlelight protests from a single level.

Link

The End of Intervention: Explaining the Decisions on US Troops Withdrawals from Afghanistan and Iraq (2022.12)

  • Author : Seongwon Gwon and  Iordanka Alexandrova
  • Publication : The Journal of International Relations
  • Publisher :  The East Asian Association Of International Studies
  • Volume : 25(4)
  • Date : December 2022

Abstract: Why did President Barack Obama’s administration withdraw US troops from Iraq, but not Afghanistan? This article examines Washington’s strategic considerations to answer this question of scholarly and practical importance. It argues that US policy on military interventions was aimed at preserving relative power. Washington decided on keeping US forces in Afghanistan because the benefits of continued intervention surpassed the costs. By staying, America blocked the expansion of Russian and Chinese influence in Central Asia and restrained local militant organizations, thus reducing the likelihood of terrorist activities and regional conflict. These benefits outweighed the moderate expenses for troops deployment and helped maintain US relative strength. Conversely, the US government withdrew from Iraq because the costs of continued intervention nullified the benefits. On one hand, America’s presence in Iraq caused confrontation with Iran, jeopardizing the peaceful resolution of the Iranian nuclear issue. On the other hand, it fueled international opposition against the US and consumed substantial funds, resulting in loss of clout and resources. As there were few benefits from continued deployment, Washington chose withdrawal to minimize the loss of US relative power.

Link

Affective Polarization among Korean Electorate : Main Causes and Non-Political Effects(2022.12)

The Problem of Historical School and Historismus (Historicism) as Genealogy of Max Weber’ Thought : Value and Status of His Thought in Relation to Philosophy and History (2022.12)

  • Author : Chiwon Choi
  • Publisher : Zeitschrift der Koreanisch-Deutschen Gesellschaft fuer Sozialwissenschaften
  • Publication : Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Sozialwissenschaften(K-G Association For Social Sciences)
  • Volume : 32(4)
  • Date : December 2022

Abstract: The link of romanticism, the historical school and historicism (Historismus) is neither ‘reason’ (freedom) nor progress advocated by the Enlightenment and inherited by Hegel, but ‘history’ (understood as life) that cannot be systematized within philosophical concepts. Weber calls himself as a ‘son of historical school’. As confirmed in many parts of the fountain of his thought, his negative attitude towards the Enlightenment and Hegel’s philosophy tells us that his thought is essentially characterized by the rejection of philosophy and the primacy of history, which historicism (Historismus) and historical school justify. Two moments are thus inherent in his thought: resistance of history to philosophy on the one hand and philosophy subsumed by history on the other hand. Thus, historicism (Historismus) and the branches of the historical school in a special sense, that is, historicist jurisprudence, historicist economics, and historicist historiography, are the source and nourishment of Weber’s thought. In this way, Weber, as a ‘son of the historical school’, stands in the tradition of Herder, Savigny, Ranke, Droysen, Dilthey, Schmoller, Windelband, Rickert etc. He fights, however, against it on the other hand, eliminating the irrationality romanticism. Through this, he forms his identity and ‘unique personality’ as a rationalistic scholar. At the same time, Weber forms his identity and ‘unique personality’ as an active politician and political thinker, following the tradition of the historical school and historicism (Historismus) in that he grasps history as a question of politics: He tries to fulfill the demands of politics of the time which are different from the conservatism that dominated this tradition. Unlike scholar-Weber, however, politician-Weber cannot completely disconnect from the irrational momentum of romanticism inherent in the tradition of the historical school and historicism (Historismus).

Link

After the 2016-17 Candlelight Protests: An Analysis of Candlelight Protesters’ Political Attitudes and Behavior (2022.12)

Abstract : What are the political impacts of the 2016-17 candlelight protests? To explore the question, this article analyzes an original survey data designed to assess whether candlelight protest participants maintain distinctive political attitudes even five years after the contentious episode. It shows that, first, candlelight protesters tend to have a higher level of political interest and efficacy and a lower level of political trust in court, the prosecution, and the police while leaning toward the left. Second, they also concern more about growing inequality while supporting the idea that democracy should try to reduce the gap between the wealthy and the poor. Third, candlelight protesters support more strongly that democracy should guarantee gender equality and authoritarianism should not be permitted in any circumstances. These attitudes of candlelight protesters are associated with a higher likelihood of turnout in the 20th presidential elections. These results imply that the micro-foundation of Korean democracy appears robust, compared to other democracies that have experienced deteriorating public confidence in democracy itself.

Link