Causes of the Kim Young-sam Administration’s Failure to Revise the South Korea–U.S. Missile Guidelines

Abstract : The purpose of this study is to analyze the causes for the failure of the Kim Young- sam administration to revise the South Korea-U.S. missile guidelines. The missile guidelines have been revised on four occasions by the governments of Kim Dae-jung, Lee Myung-bak, and Moon Jae-in, yet despite its clear willingness to amend the guidelines, the administration of Kim Young-sam was unable to negotiate a revision. This study explores the reasons for the failure and makes two important contributions. First, it carries out a theoretical approach through the historical context of the South Korea-U.S. missile agreement. Second, it explores the reality of the South Korea-U.S. missile agreement and suggests meaningful directions for new negotiations. The study reveals similar characteristics across all governments. However, the Kim Young-sam administration exhibited strong hostility toward North Korea, raising the issue of the risk of entrapment during the South Korea-U.S. missile negotiations.

Peace and the European Intellectual History

  • Author : Byung-Kon Kim
  • Journal : ZdkGDS
  • Publisher : Koreanisch-Deutsche Gesellschaft Fuer Sozialwissenschaften
  • Volume : 34(4)
  • Date : 2020.11
  • Abstract : The main theme of this thesis is a historical examination of the meaning of peace in the European intellectual history. Academic research and the practical pursuit of peace have existed for a long time. However, respectively different meanings and limitations have been shown with regard to the understanding of peace in each time period. Also, perceptions of peace before modern times were progressed with clear limitations at the very least. The ancient Greeks understood people to be beings that cannot live without politics and the state and they understood issues of peaceful living to be the meaning of harmonious living among fellow citizens who belong to the same polis and they were unable to achieve true consciousness related to issues of peace with outside countries. Perceptions of universal human peace became possible after cosmopolitanism was met with the collapse of the polis and the appearance of the Roman empire. Also, Stoa’s pacifism changed through Christianity. Full-scale and active pacifism appeared with the appearance of early Christianity. As it became established as a state religion during the middle ages, active pacifism was reexamined and just wars were once again accepted. Therefore, full-scale and strong pacifism was developed after modern times and particularly after the appearance of Johan Galtung. Galtung presented issues of active peace, which transcends the passive concept of a simple absence of conflict, based on an expansive understanding of violence. Also, Senghaas expanded the issue of peace by connecting it with civilization. Senghaas viewed that a civilized conflict resolution model used within a nation can be applied to international relations as well. To him, peaceful international order can be constructed through processes in which the similar national order of diverse regions supplement each other and become stabilized. Theories of peace in the 21st century are connected to feminism and ecologism and they are developing futuristically as they embrace gender issues, environment issues, issues of sustainability, and perceptions of civilization and culture.

Source Link

Foreign Policy Dilemma in South Korean Democracy: Challenge of Polarized and Politicized Public Opinion (2020.10)

  • Author : Shin-wha Lee
  • Journal : Peace Studies
  • Publisher : Peace and Democracy Institute
  • Volume : 28(2)
  • Publication Date : October 2020
  • Abstract : The paper empirically examines the extent to which the public’s perceptions and preferences have been reflected in the official foreign policymaking process in Korea. Through this analysis, the paper discusses the relationship between democracy and foreign policy determinants, and highlights the problems that arise due to polarization of the public. The paper argues that the divided political jinyoung nonri (partisanship argument) within the country poses the biggest threat to Korean diplomacy, as the political polarization among both political elites and civic groups increasingly causes great restrictions in foreign policymaking. The paper demonstrates how these issues have been relevant in recent years by analyzing and comparing the foreign policy decision-making process in Korea during three diplomatic episodes: the Mad cow disease protests in 2008, opposition against the ‘comfort women’ agreement signed in 2015; and public debates about the deployment of THAAD Batteries since 2017. These cases demonstrate how Korean governments may be prohibited from pursuing foreign policies essential for its national interests and security due to domestic pressure from a polarized public, or promote unwise strategies based on misguided populism. In many ways, this emphasizes the need for a ‘win-win’ approach between the government and citizens through constructive conversations about Korea’s foreign policy, especially because the public will continue to be more involved in the foreign policy decision-making process.

Source Link

Territorial threat and women’s legislative representation(2020.07)

Abstract : Why do some countries have fewer women in parliament than do others? Recent studies find that women have less access to positions of political power in countries facing external threats. Existing studies, however, do not differentiate between types of threat. We theorize that territorial threats are a particular driver of gender inequality in national parliaments. When a country’s land is under threat, people prefer having “tough” representatives in the national legislature who are competent on the military and defence more so than when a country faces other threats. Moreover, when countries face territorial threats, they build larger standing armies and adopt military conscription, raising the level of militarization in society, which negatively influences women’s access to the national legislature. Using a time-series cross-sectional data set of 101 democracies, we find that countries facing external territorial threats have lower percentages of women in parliament compared to countries facing other or no external threats. Additionally, we find that countries with higher levels of militarization have fewer women in the national legislature.

Source Link

Envy and Pride: How Economic Inequality Deepens Happiness Inequality in South Korea (2020.07)

  • Author :  Woo Chang Kang, Jae Seung Lee, and BK Song
  • Journal : Social Indicators Research
  • Publisher : Springer
  • Volume : 150(2)
  • Publication Date : July 2020
  • DOI: 10.1007/s11205-020-02339-2 
  • Abstract : This paper examines how economic inequality at the local level affects individuals’ subjective well-being (SWB) through social comparison in Seoul, South Korea. We implement a multi-level analysis combining asset inequality, calculated using the actual transaction prices of apartments, and public opinion surveys conducted by Seoul Metropolitan City between 2008 and 2016. Our analysis shows that inequality negatively affects SWB among respondents whose family income is lower than the median (the envy effect), but drives up SWB among the other half (the pride effect). Further analysis on the effect of inequality on subjective class awareness corroborates a social comparison mechanism: the haves embrace an upper-class awareness as local inequality increases, while the have-nots embrace a lower class awareness. These findings suggest that, despite concerns about economic inequality and its negative consequences, calling for policy reform to reduce inequality may be unpersuasive to the better off members of society, especially if doing so increases individual financial burdens.