Journal Article
Possibilities and Limitations of Human Rights Cooperation in East Asia: Focusing on the COVID-19 and the Myanmar Crisis (2022.10)
- Author : Hun Joon Kim
- Publication : Oughtopia
- Publisher : Kyung Hee Institute for Human Society
- Volume : 37(2)
- Date : November 2022
Abstract: Scholars have studied possibilities and limitations of cooperation in human rights issues. Students of East Asian human rights politics have discovered that findings from other regions cannot easily be applied to the region. First, East Asia is characterized by a lack of regional human rights institutions and organizations to coordinate during the time of human rights crises. Moreover, bilateral relations between Korea-Japan, China-Japan, and Taiwan-China all show that power politics dominate and the politics of memory is highly contentious. This article examines the possibilities and limitations of human rights cooperation in East Asia, focusing on the two recent human rights crises in the region: (1) the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on human rights and (2) the military coup and subsequent human rights violations in Myanmar. The two cases confirm that the findings from other regions do not fit to East Asia. However, both cases also show some important possibilities. First, the COVID-19 case shows that when faced with unprecedented global pandemic, human rights protection is possible when countries learn from and cooperate with each other. Second, the Myanmar case shows that not only governments but also civil societies are critical actors in promoting human rights in the region.
Electing More Women to National Legislatures: An Interplay between Global Normative Pressure and Domestic Political Regimes (2022.10)
- Author : Mi Hwa Hong and Nam Kyu Kim
- Publication : International Studies Quarterly
- Publisher : Oxford University Press
- Volume : 66(4)
- Date : October, 2022
Abstract : Existing studies show that democracies are no better than autocracies in terms of women’s legislative representation. This finding seems counterintuitive because democracies are more politically inclusive and foster greater respect for civil and political rights, compared to autocracies. We revisit the relationship between democracy and women’s legislative representation by considering the interaction between democracy and global norms of gender equality in politics. We argue that democracies are better able than autocracies to translate a global norm of gender-balanced political representation into actual domestic practices. Further, we contend that the effect of democracies also depends on the external normative pressure. Using a time-series cross-sectional dataset covering 147 countries from 1951 to 2013, our analysis shows that the more democratic a country is, the more responsive it is to global norms promoting gender equality in politics. It also demonstrates that the effect of democracy on women’s representation strengthens, as global normative pressure for women’s inclusion in politics grows.